Tags: Sro
According to Irina Kuzevanova, executive director of the Union of Builders of Kuzbass, representing at the Congress the Kemerovo region, the law on self -regulatory organizations has contradictions and many flaws. Unlike the intersectoral law on self -regulation in the Russian Federation, the Town Planning Code provides for a single form of creation of SRO – non -profit partnership. Non -profit partnership is not liable for the obligations of its members, and members, in Turn, are responsible for the obligations of the partnership.
If the compensation fund begins to answer in full for the results of the entrepreneurial activities of members, that law is rudely violated. In accordance with civil law regulations, non -profit organizations today are prohibited from participating in entrepreneurial activity. The presence of a compensation fund for SRO says that the organization actually becomes a member of the economic turnover, which is a violation of the law.
“Compensation fund is not targeted funds, not an entry fee,” said Irina Alekseevna.
– Practically, this is the target capital, which should be frozen and is required to be at least 100 Million daily.
rubles from builders and 50 Million. rubles from designers. Therefore, in this case, the development of the law on target capital, on the procedure for its formation, expenditure, etc.D. It is necessary to decide and amend both tax legislation and accounting rules in order to free this target capital from value added tax and income tax tax. If this does not happen, practically we will all be forced to work for taxes from target capital.
It’s a shame that in such a fund -forming industry, we are building our legislation in a hurry, a new system that contradicts civil law. However, the law entered into force and we need to somehow implement it “.
They will reach the legislator